Gabriela Moreira Research Group: Innovation and Labour Supervisor(s): Helena Lopes, Cesaltina Pires Summary N.A. Period: ... - 2015 Resources: N.A. #IL #GabrielaMoreira #HelenaLopes

Sónia Costa Research Group: Governance, Economy and Citizenry Supervisor(s): Alexandra Castro Summary N.A. Period: 2010 - ... Resources: N.A. #GEC #AlexandraCastro #SóniaCosta

Pedro Oliveira Research Group: Cities and Territories Supervisor(s): Pedro Costa Summary N.A. Period: ... - 2013 Resources: N.A. #CT #PedroOliveira #PedroCosta

Rolando Volzone Research Group: Cities and Territories Supervisor(s): José Luís Saldanha, Aurora da Conceição Parreira Carapinha Summary N.A. Period: 2015 - 2019 Resources: N.A. #CT #RolandoVolzone #JoséLuísPossoloSaldanha

Maximina Almeida Research Group: Cities and Territories Supervisor(s): Paulo Tormenta Pinto Summary N.A. Period: 2011 - 2017 Resources: N.A. #MaximinaAlmeida #PauloTormentaPinto #CT

Mariana Salvador Research Group: Cities and Territories Supervisor(s): Teresa Marat-Mendes, Maria do Rosário Oliveira Summary N.A. Period: 2013-2018 Resources: N.A. #CT #MarianaSalvador #TeresaMaratMendes

Sandra Pinheiro Research Group: Governance, Economy and Citizenry Supervisor(s): Emanuel Leão Summary N.A. Period: ... - 2015 Resources: N.A. #GEC #SandraPinheiro #EmanuelLeão

Alexandra Areia Research Group: Cities and Territories Supervisor(s): Ana Vaz Milheiro Summary N.A. Period: 2011 - 2017 Resources: N.A. #AlexandraAreia #AnaVazMilheiro #CT

Leonor Matos Silva Research Group: Cities and Territories Supervisor(s): Ana Vaz Milheiro Summary N.A. Period: 2012-2017 Resources: N.A. #CT #AnaVazMilheiro #LeonorMatosSilva

Authors: Sónia Cardoso, Maria J. Rosa, Pedro Videira , Alberto Amaral Research Group: Innovation and Labour Date: 2017 Publisher: Quality Assurance in Education Link: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/QAE-03-2017-0007 Publication type: Scientific journal article Research Project: N.A. Abstract: Purpose: This paper aims to look at the characteristics of internal quality assurance (IQA) systems of higher education institutions to understand whether these systems tend to reproduce a given model, externally defined and suggested to institutions, or rather to be shaped by institutions’ features and interests. Design/methodology/approach: The study is supported in the analysis of the content of self-assessment reports of 12 internal QA systems certified, in Portugal, between 2012 and 2015. An analysis grid was used based on three categories: IQA systems’ historical framework, structural/managerial component and monitoring, assessment and continuous improvement. Findings: Institutions tended to follow a “one size fits all” approach, meaning that external (European and national) quality assurance (QA) references were used in an identical way, giving origin to rather similar IQA systems. Institutional characteristics do not seem to have played a relevant role, eventually due to institutions’ will to obtain their systems’ certification and, thus, achieve a light-touch external QA. Research limitations/implications: The study was based on the analysis of only certified IQA systems and relies on document analysis. It would be interesting to also include non-certified systems, in a comparative perspective, complemented with data deriving from interviews and/or questionnaires with some of the actors involved in the certification process. Practical implications: The study provides an understanding of how IQA systems are being implemented in Portugal. Thus, it can be of interest to other institutions as well as to QA agencies. Originality/value: The study addresses a topic still relatively absent from research on QA in higher education, being of interest for researchers in the field. #2017 #PedroVideira #IL